Posts

通过完全由有理数构成的区间套来揭示无理数的存在

Image
本讲的前提是: For the time being, all quantities occurring are assumed to be rational numbers. 假设我们所知道的数只有有理数,还不知道无理数的存在。 这里说的null-sequence 是rational null-sequence ,定义如下 继续 the second class is empty的例子请看 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completeness_of_the_real_numbers#Nested_intervals_theorem 的Nested intervals theorem部分  

有理数的稠密性(The rational points are dense on the number axis.)

Image
每一个实数都能用有理数去逼近到任意精确的程度,这就是有理数的稠密性。The rational points are dense on the number axis.   

$\int _{0}^{1}xdx=\dfrac {1} {2}$

$\int _{0}^{1}xdx=\dfrac {1} {2}$

[Homepage] Media Downloader - a Chrome extension to download Coursera video and the PLAYING video or audio from many other sites

Image
Media Downloader can help you download the PLAYING video or audio from Coursera and many other sites. Note when the  multimedia file is not in playing, Media Downloader cannot download it for you :) Download the extension and the tutorial from Google drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0yEgmz6VGdzZzgtcF8yZGhPcmM/view Microsoft OneDrive: http://1drv.ms/1NhYzYE

why we call 0 an Infinitesimal ?

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1086713/is-0-an-infinitesimal In dictionary , Infinitesimal means ‘an indefinitely small quantity; a value approaching zero’, but natural language is a bad reference for mathematical definitions; it’s 'optimized’ for quickly conveying meaning in 'natural’ settings, not for expressing things precisely. In the context of nonstandard analysis, 0 should certainly be infinitesimal. Even in the limit case, you write “as x→0 f(x)→a” and you intend this to hold in the case that f(x) is constant equal to a. Therefore you need 0 to be considered infinitesimal if you want f(x)→a to be a formalization of infinitesimals. Basically it ends up making more sense to exclude zero in the cases where it should be excluded, then to explicitly include it where it should be included. Stylistically speaking, “nonzero infinitesimal” is much less clunky than “infinitesimal or zero”.